Token Generation
Configure, review, and deploy from one workflow.
What it is
Network selection, token parameters, permissions, and a simulated deployment pipeline — the same surface a production launch will use.
Configure, review, and deploy a token from one workflow — with the ownership and permission decisions made explicitly rather than inherited from a template.
The public Console runs this module on fabricated data. Nothing there is signed or broadcast.
Who it is for
New token launch
Full configuration and deployment for a first mainnet token, with the permission model decided deliberately.
Testnet rehearsal
Run the exact workflow on a test network before committing gas or announcing anything.
Feature review
Walk stakeholders through which contract capabilities are enabled and why, before deployment.
Multi-chain deployment
Deploy matching parameters across chains as part of an expansion or migration.
How it works
- 01Choose a networkChain selection drives gas estimates, available features, and the contract standard used.
- 02Set token detailsName, symbol, total supply, decimals, description, and logo — validated as you type.
- 03Configure featuresEnable only what you need. Each toggle explains what it allows and what it commits you to.
- 04Assign ownershipOwner wallet, multisig, or renouncement, with explicit warnings before irreversible choices.
- 05Review everythingFull summary of parameters, features, permissions, and estimated cost on one screen.
- 06Run the deploymentWatch the pipeline execute stage by stage, then collect the resulting contract artefacts.
What it includes
Multi-network
Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, and Solana modelled, with the selector built to take more.
Explained feature toggles
Mintable, burnable, pausable, capped supply, blacklist, and tax — each with the trade-off stated at the point of decision.
Ownership models
Single owner, multisig assignment, or renouncement, with warnings on the irreversible paths.
Live token preview
Name, ticker, supply, decimals, and network reflected immediately in a preview card.
Pre-deploy review
Every enabled feature, permission, and parameter listed on one screen before anything runs.
Gas estimation
Indicative deployment cost per network so the choice is not made blind.
Deployment pipeline
Compile, security check, prepare, broadcast, confirm — each stage surfaced as it happens.
Post-deploy artefacts
Contract address, transaction hash, owner, and supply, with verification and download paths.
Boundaries
Every irreversible decision is surfaced before it is made, and the public workflow cannot broadcast.
- Renouncement and ownership transfer require explicit confirmation with the consequence stated
- Pause and blacklist capabilities are flagged as features exchanges and holders will ask about
- The public generator has no signer, no wallet connection, and no broadcast path
- Production deployment runs on an authenticated surface with review on contract parameters
- Multisig assignment before mainnet is recommended in the flow, not buried in documentation
Questions
Does this deploy a real token?
Not from the public site. The generator here is a simulation with no signer and no broadcast path. Production deployment happens on a separate authenticated surface, with review on the contract parameters before anything is submitted.
Which networks are supported?
Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, and Solana are modelled today. The network selector is a configuration surface rather than a hardcoded list, so adding a chain is a data change and a contract target, not a rewrite.
Should we enable mint, pause, or blacklist?
Usually fewer than teams initially want. Each one is a permission you will be asked to justify by exchanges, auditors, and holders. The workflow states the trade-off at the point of decision so the answer is deliberate.
Can we move ownership to a multisig later?
Yes, if the contract retains transferable ownership — which is why renouncement carries an explicit warning. The recommended path is to assign multisig ownership before mainnet rather than planning to migrate afterwards.
Do we get the contract source?
Yes. Source, constructor parameters, and a verification path are part of the deployment output. You should be able to verify the contract independently of us.